Section 1 is the Introduction to this volume. Section 2 .. These DoDAF data groups support both DoDAF viewpoints and the DoD key processes: the Joint. DoDAF Volume 2 describes the technical aspects of data collection presentation descriptions and DoDAF-described Models in Volumes 1 and 2 provide guidance DoDAFV is intended to be methodology agnostic. DoDAF Architecture Framework Version The Department of Defense Architecture Framework (DoDAF) is an architecture framework for . OV-1 High Level Operational Concept Graphic: High level graphical and .. DoDAF V · Printable version of DoDAF V Volume 1 · Printable version of DoDAF V Volume 2.
|Published (Last):||13 May 2007|
|PDF File Size:||1.73 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||12.21 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
These views are artifacts for visualizing, understanding, and assimilating the broad scope doodaf complexities of an architecture description through tabularstructuralbehavioralontologicalpictorialtemporalgraphicalprobabilisticor alternative conceptual means.
The DM2 defines architectural data elements and enables the integration and federation of Architectural Descriptions.
In April the Version 1. DoDAF has a meta-model underpinning the framework, defining the types of modelling elements that can be used in each view and the relationships between them.
The relationship between architecture data elements across the SV to the OV can be exemplified as systems are procured and fielded to support organizations and their operations. United States Department of Defense information technology Enterprise architecture frameworks. The actual sequence of view generation and their potential customization is a function of the application domain and the specific needs of the effort. The DoDAF provides a foundational framework for developing and representing architecture descriptions that ensure a common denominator for understanding, comparing, and integrating architectures across organizational, joint, and multinational boundaries.
The DoDAF deskbook provides examples in using traditional systems engineering and data engineering techniques, and secondly, UML format. The Department of Defense Architecture Framework DoDAF is an architecture framework for the United States Department of Defense DoD that provides visualization infrastructure for specific stakeholders concerns through viewpoints organized by various views.
Retrieved from ” https: As one example, the DoDAF v1. DoD weapons and information technology system acquisitions are required to develop and document an enterprise architecture EA using the views prescribed in the DoDAF. The concept of capability, as defined by its Meta-model Data Group allows one to answer questions such as:.
The developing system must not only meet its internal data needs but also those of the operational framework into which it is set. These products are organized under four views:.
In addition to graphical representation, there is typically a requirement to 20. metadata to the Defense Information Technology Portfolio Repository DITPR or other architectural repositories. The approach depends on the requirements and the expected results; i. DoD Business Systems Modernization: One concern about the DoDAF is how well these products meet actual stakeholder concerns volumw any given system of interest.
As the DM2 matures to meet the ongoing data requirements of process owners, decision makers, architects, and new technologies, it will evolve to a resource that more completely supports the requirements for architectural data, published in a consistently understandable way, and will enable greater ease for discovering, sharing, and reusing architectural data across organizational boundaries.
Department of Defense Architecture Framework
The sequence of the artifacts listed below gives a suggested order in which the artifacts could be developed. In other projects Wikimedia Commons. These views offer overview and details aimed to specific stakeholders within their domain and in interaction with other domains in which the system will operate.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. In simpler terms, integration is seen in the connection from items common among architecture products, where items shown in one architecture product such doaf sites used or systems interfaced or services provided should have the identical number, name, and meaning appear in related architecture product views.
It establishes a basis for semantic i. This document addressed usage, integrated architectures, DoD and Federal policies, value of architectures, architecture measures, DoD decision support processes, development techniques, dodzf techniques, and the CADM v1.
TRAK Community :: Wiki :: DODAF
This page was last edited on 3 Octoberat It defines the type of information exchanged, the frequency of exchanges, the tasks and activities supported by these exchanges and the nature of the exchanges.
Commons category link is on Wikidata. Systems and services view SV is a set of graphical and textual products that describe systems and services and interconnections providing for, or supporting, DoD functions. These architecture descriptions may include families of systems FoSsystems of systems SoSand net-centric capabilities for interoperating and interacting in the non-combat environment.
DoDAF generically describes in the representation of the artifacts to be generated, but allows considerable flexibility regarding the specific formats and modeling techniques.
Operational View OV products provide descriptions of the tasks and activities, operational elements, and information exchanges required to accomplish DoD missions.
This Architecture Framework is especially suited to large systems with complex integration and interoperability challenges, and it is apparently unique in its employment of “operational views”.
Department of Defense for developing enterprise architecture has been debated:.
Department of Defense Architecture Framework – Wikipedia
These views relate to stakeholder requirements for producing an Architectural Description. For the purposes of architecture development, the term integrated means that data required in more than one of the architectural models is commonly defined and understood across those models.
All view AV products provide overarching descriptions of the entire architecture volumf define the scope and context of the architecture. It broadened the applicability of architecture tenets and practices to all Mission Areas rather than just the C4ISR community.
The three views and their interrelationships — driven by common architecture data elements — provide the basis for deriving measures such as interoperability doadf performance, and for measuring the impact of the values of these metrics on operational mission and task effectiveness.
While it is clearly aimed at military systems, DoDAF has broad applicability across the private, public and voluntary sectors vloume the world, and represents one of a large number of systems architecture frameworks.
Only a subset of the full DoDAF viewset is usually created for each system development. Integrated architectures are vlume property or design principle for architectures at all levels: Each view depicts certain perspectives of an architecture as described below.
It establishes data element definitions, rules, and relationships and a baseline set of products for consistent development of systems, integrated, or federated architectures.
Each of these three levels of the DM2 is important to a particular viewer of Departmental processes:. A capability thread would equate to the specific activities, rules, and systems that are linked to that particular capability.