Akta Keterangan (Akta 56) & Akta Keterangan Saksi Kanak-kanak ( Akta ) (Hingga 5hb Mac ). rates Be the first to write a review. Akta Keterangan (Akta 56) & Akta Keterangan Saksi Kanak-Kanak ( Akta ). International Law Book Services. Akta Keterangan (Akta 56) & Akta Keterangan Saksi Kanak-Kanak Author: ILBS. RM PRE-ORDER. Out of stock. Category: Law & Taxation.
| Author: | Zuluzil Gomuro |
| Country: | Libya |
| Language: | English (Spanish) |
| Genre: | Spiritual |
| Published (Last): | 11 June 2008 |
| Pages: | 135 |
| PDF File Size: | 4.79 Mb |
| ePub File Size: | 14.15 Mb |
| ISBN: | 461-4-38057-661-7 |
| Downloads: | 62261 |
| Price: | Free* [*Free Regsitration Required] |
| Uploader: | Nir |
PENGHUNI GUA: MALAYSIA LAW JOURNAL : KES KEBOLEHTERIMAAN KETERANGAN SEORANG KANAK-KANAK
Appeal – Findings of fact by trial judge – Misdirection in invoking presumption under s. Anwar Ibrahim Dot Com. The first, second and fifth appellants were sentenced to death, the third appellant was detained under s. The prosecution was not tendering the cautioned ketfrangan of the appellant so as to require a voire dire trial within a trial to be conducted to determine the voluntariness of the cautioned statement see PP v Mohamed Noor bin Jantan [] 2 MLJ where the Federal Court held that since the defence tendered the cautioned statement at the prosecution stage as a defence exhibit, there was no need to hold a trial within a trial as its voluntariness was not disputed.
Disclosure – Privilege – Information relating to journalist’s source of information – Whether protected from disclosure – Whether journalist may be ordered to disclose source of information – Criteria to be satisfied for ordering disclosure. OKT2 menghadapi dua pertuduhan bagi kesalahan yang boleh dihukum di bawah s. OKT2 mengakui tidak pernah dilantik oleh Seri Paduka Baginda berdua untuk menandatangani perjanjian-perjanjian tersebut bagi pihak Baginda masing-masing. After all there is no legal presumption that an interested witness should not be believed.
Dalam keadaan tersebut, ia adalah keputusan yang selamat dan campur tangan peringkat rayuan tidak diperlukan. From Atka With Love.
The instant case did not concern breaches of security issues. Held dismissing appeals; affirming convictions and sentences Per Rohana Yusuf JCA delivering the judgment of the court: Oleh itu, OKT1 berjaya menimbulkan keraguan munasabah bagi tuduhan terhadapnya. Keputusan bersalah dan sabitan perayu itu telah disahkan dengan kedua hukuman untuk berjalan keteranga dari hari perbicaraan kerana kepentingan awam hanya boleh dicapai jika beliau dipenjarakan untuk masa yang lebih lama.
Beliau berhak dipercayai sehingga sebab-sebab yang meyakinkan untuk tidak mempercayainya boleh dikemukakan jika terdapat keterangan yang menunjukkan sebaliknya dan memandangkan keadaan sekelingnya. Selepas penilaian maksimum keterangan dan menggunapakai s.
In a case of this nature, medical evidence adduced by the prosecution is sufficient to corroborate the evidence of the victim: Nasib baik ada jmpa kes ni. Several witnesses were called to support his defence of alibi. These were the facts that compelled the trial court to conclude that the appellant had more than ample opportunity to commit rape.
It is as follows:. At the end of the trial, the trial judge found that the appellants had failed to raise any reasonable doubt on the prosecution’s case and convicted the appellants.
Akta Keterangan 1950 (Akta 56) & Akta Keterangan Saksi Kanak-Kanak 2007
Whereas in the case of an unsworn child witness, s A of the Act applies. I do not propose to disturb the sentence as imposed by the trial court. Semuga semua pembaca dan pelajar mendapat menafaat dari alasan penghakiman kes di atas. Kidnapping Act – Section 3 – Offence of kidnapping – Grounds of appeal – Whether identification parade flawed and defective – Whether trial judge failed to warn himself against accepting evidence of 13 year old victim – Whether test of maximum evaluation and beyond reasonable doubt rightly applied – Whether trial judge erred in law and fact in sentencing – Whether appellate interference warranted – Kidnapping Acts.
Atas keseluruhan keterangan, sabitan ketiga-tiga perayu adalah selamat.
Mahkamah menyoal saksi aktw memastikan jika beliau memahami sifat keterangan bersumpah. The appellant testified that he was elsewhere and not at the places mentioned in both the charges and, therefore, he had no opportunity to commit rape. Hence, the plaintiff made the present application pursuant to s. Pertubohan Berita Nasional Malaysia v. Pengeluaran bahan-bahan tersebut didorong dan kapsul-kapsul yang mengandungi methamphetamine dikeluarkan.
The trial court had rightly and fairly assessed all the evidence and came to the right conclusions in convicting the appellant on both the charges. The ketefangan to s A of the Act in simple terms means this: I may add that even the slightest penetration, like in the instant appeal, will be sufficient.
The appellants were kanak-kajak charged under s. It was contended that SP3 and SP10 SP3’s classmate, who witnessed SP3 being dragged into the car were children and the trial judge did not conduct a preliminary inquiry to test the competency of the witnesses as required under ss. Pada asasnya, isu-isu yang dibangkitkan oleh perayu-perayu, antara lain, adalah: Child Acts.
Kemungkinan pihak pembeli tidak mempunyai wang yang cukup untuk melunaskan amaun yang tertera pada cek-cek tersebut pada masa ia diserahkan, bukan isu yang material.
According to the doctor, one of the causes of the tear in the hymen was sexual intercourse. Akha the appellant did was indeed despicable and public interest would be best served if he is kept longer in prison.
Dato Seri Najib Razak. Khai 8 May at There is no extenuating circumstances in favour of the appellant save that he is now aged 63 years and cannot be whipped s of the Criminal Procedure Keteranhan FMS Cap 6.