Hazrat Muaviyah [r.a] Aur Tareekhi Haqaiq By Shaykh Mufti Taqi Usmani A FAMOUS BOOK WRITTEN IN DEFENCE OF HAZRAT MUAVIA [R.A] Hazrat Ameer Muaviyah [r.a] Aur Tareekhi Rivayaat By Shaykh Muhammad. Ameer Muawiya Aur Tareekhi Haqaiq Author Mufti Taqi Usmani. May Click to Download Click to Read on Scribd. Post a Comment. For More Islamic Books For More Islamic Books Visit For More I.

Author: Voodooshura Kigazragore
Country: Finland
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Career
Published (Last): 20 October 2012
Pages: 478
PDF File Size: 11.86 Mb
ePub File Size: 11.20 Mb
ISBN: 492-3-31344-386-5
Downloads: 56642
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Mezijas

New articles and books are added this website on 1 st of each month. We cannot say about a theory that “it tarsekhi has happened. I hope you get my point. All those who accepted their caliphate will also be charged automatically as they accepted corrupt rulers. And then he tried to convert the muslim khilafat into malookiat.

Since the matter is grave, we should evaluate the authenticity of the events reported by the history.

The length of ruling period is not a sign of patients. A riwaiat is not authentic because the rawi hxqaiq shia and the same muasiya another riwaiat by a shia rawi is authentic because it favours his opinion We should keep a good view Husn Zann about all the companions and leave the matter of their internal disputes of Allah. The same procedure haqaq be applied to historical reports as well. If the answer is yes, we tareekhi go for it but if the answer is no, why to conduct a debate on an issue that has not been settled during last 14 centuries.

If you study the history of Tabari for such years, you’ll find people in the Sanad of all negative reports about the companions. Assalam o alaikum wa Rahmatullah. Recently, a group of Arab scholars named BarzanjiHallaqZia al- U’mri and Khalil have conducted that evaluation and found that large number of reports in this book are fake.


You know that a theory means, “it might have happened “. Only haqaiiq person will reach at a real conclusion who was present at that occasion and bears eyewitness of an incident. Regards Respected Sister Wa alaikum us salam wa Rahmatullah The views presented in the books belong to their authors and they are responsible amrer providing the answer raised on their work.

If the matter is not much disturbing, I’ll urge you to leave the matter to Allah. It is also reported in some narrations that he changed his decision once he found that a rule has already been established there. I even extend this to all other people and do not accuse anyone for any charge against him and leave their matter to Allah. If some Sahaba had something wrong, Allah will not ask us about that but if they were really acquitted from that, we will haqiaq held responsible in front of Allah for believing in reports transmitted through doubtful channels.

Since you’ve mentioned that you are not a ShiaI’ll urge you to study it with an open mind and analyze its content critically.

H Ameer muaawia aor tareekhi haqaiq

Even we cannot reach at a decisive conclusion about events happening in our life. I read the book thoroughly but I am sorry instead of making me satisfy it has made me more doubtful.

I agree with you that narrations from such people should not be accepted in other matters even it is in favor of our view. Thank you very much for answering me. My point is that if you want to quote an example it should be a good example.

I hope you ll not think that I am a Shia because ‘I am not’. The book is available at the following links: My objective of providing you with the book was to demonstrate that two points of view exist on this issue and both groups have their own arguments based on the reports compiled by Imam Tabari.


The approach of Tabari was to compile all the narrations whether authentic or not in a chronological order. It is very logical. It is completely wrong to compare him with culprits like Zia or Musharaf. Details of this procedure are available here: Search the Website New. Whatever is the opinion of Sunnis, Shias or Khawarij on such issues, it is no more than a theory based on doubtful reports because Sunni reports are not acceptable to Shia and vice versa.

Because I am the student of history and I know what the Amir Muawia did in his 20 years rule.

Hazrat Ameer Muaviyah [r.a] Aur Tareekhi Rivayaat By Shaykh Muhammad Saqib Risalpuri – Free Books

We also know that all such people disguised themselves in mainstream Muslims. Hwqaiq I conducted such research, I found that almost all reports containing negative information about such companions was reported by one or more of the five narrators mentioned above.

Mohadisin have devised a great procedure to myawiya authenticity of Hadith. Don’t hesitate to share your questions and comments. We know that some people are biased towards Hazrat Abu BakrU’mar.

In the first century, even it was not possible to distinguish people as the dispute was only political and not religious. There is no doubt that the incident of Karbala a,eer a grave incident of our history.

Although we are not sure about authenticity of such reports.