General description: The coping strategy questionnaire. (CSQ), (Rosenstiel & Keefe ) in its original version consists of 50 items assessing patient self rated. We present a study with the aim of investigating the internal consistency and reliability of a Swedish version of the Coping. Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ). We present a study with the aim of investigating the internal consistency and reliability of a Swedish version of the Coping Strategies.
|Published (Last):||24 June 2012|
|PDF File Size:||6.51 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||10.45 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The meaning of the original items was adequately captured by the idiomatic translation of the CSQ-Revised. Acknowledgments The authors thank Kevin Smart for his help in preparing the English version of the manuscript. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Italian validation of the CES-D self-rating scale.
Validity of the Sickness Impact Profile Roland as a measure of dysfunction in chronic pain patients. The factor structure of the Coping Strategies Questionnaire.
The questionnaire was developed following international recommendations. First, its cross-sectional design means that significant correlations should not be confused with causal effects.
There was a problem providing the content you requested
No significant effects were found for any of the subscales Table 3. Our findings provide further evidence regarding the relationships between CSQ-Revised and CPCI, two widely used questionnaires that assess coping strategies in individuals with chronic pain. Telephonefaxe-mail ti. Robinson et al 7.
Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ)
The CSQ-Revised was questiojnaire in Analyzing the psychometric properties of an outcome measure is a quesstionnaire process that is strateies recommended to strengthen its properties and expand its applicability to specific populations and contexts The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. However, the CSQ-Revised version has yet to be adapted and psychometrically analyzed in Italian subjects, thus limiting the opportunities for researchers and clinicians to share the validated outcomes of chronic pain patients.
CFA met all of the fit criteria confirming the model on the present sample Table 2 7. The questionnaire was translated into Italian using a strategiex of forward-backward translation involving four translators. Scand J Behav Ther. The questionnaire was acceptable and easily understood, and could be self-administered in approximately 10 min. Prendere le distanze dal dolore 131415 Our internal consistency was satisfactory, thus confirming the extent to which the items assessed the same construct.
The Italian version of the CSQ-Revised confirmed the factor structure of the original English version and showed good psychometric properties.
The sociodemographic characteristics of the participants are presented in Table 1. Testing Structural Equation Models. The expert committee re-evaluated all of the findings, although no further adjustment was required.
Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ)
Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Ignorare le questipnnaire dolorose: Two independent bilingual translators whose first language was English back-translated the initial translation; they did not have medical backgrounds and were unaware of the concepts being explored.
A comparison of two measures. Empirical dimensions of coping in chronic pain patients: J Consult Clin Psychol. Consistent with the English findings 8our estimates of construct validity highlighted the adaptive ie, Distraction, Ignoring pain sensations, Distancing from pain and Coping self-statements and maladaptive properties Catastrophizing and Praying of most of the subscales 47 Cross-validation of the factor structure of the Coping Strategies Questionnaire.
Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. The Coping Strategies Questionnaire: