Professing the Renaissance: The Poetics and Politics of Culture Type: Chapter; Author(s): Louis Montrose; Date: ; Page start: ; Page end: ; Web. Louis Adrian Montrose is an American literary theorist and academic scholar. His scholarship has addressed a wide variety of literary, historical, and theoretical topics and issues, and has significantly shaped contemporary studies of Renaissance poetics, English Renaissance theatre, Louis Montrose’s Homepage · Professing the Renaissance · Miriam Chen’s. Professing the Renaissance: The Poetics and Politics of Culture. Louis A. Montrose. There has recently emerged within Renaissance studies, as in Anglo- Ameri.
|Published (Last):||8 October 2015|
|PDF File Size:||10.86 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||3.21 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Louis Montrose | Literary Theory and Criticism
Placed first among a group of verses that commend Spenser’s heroic poem to its royal reader in the edition is a sonnet in which Sir Walter Ralegh envisions Spenser as overgoing sic Petrarch – not the heroic poet of the Latin Africa but the love poet of the vernacular Canzoniere and Trionfi. This is, however, a task for those to follow; the length of this thesis does not allow for such an extensive research. Greenblatt, Stephen and G.
This gives his essay that which is missing from the others: Characteristic distinctions between literature and history are sidelined. Some studies use a literary text to map power relations in a society. Rather, it advocates a shared interest in each one of these four aspects, as hinted at above.
To attempt this within the scope of this thesis would be, however, quite unfeasible. Nevertheless, this might be considered a second discontinuity in the shared methodology: The conclusion from this thesis could be that there is, at least through this one case study of Louis Montrose, a noticeable difference between theory and practice.
Speaking With the Dead: It thus makes it hard to spot the difference between a synchronic and diachronic approach of the scholar towards a literary text and its relationship with reality.
Yet, what is a theoretical framework without a practice? The possibilities for action are always socially and historically situated, always limited and limiting. A Conversation with the Living: Thus when wanting to observe a set of shared tue of the New Historicism, modelled onto Abrams, this means a two-folded subdivision will need to be made, i.
The historical figure of the author is reconfigured by the contemporary critic: If, on the other hand, this is a cultural reference, then Montrose cannot be said to be diachronic in the analyses that are studied here.
However, this is only part of the task that renaizsance ahead, as the New Historicism is or can be regarded to be both diachronic and synchronic in its approach.
Stephen Greenblatt offers a working definition, which Dollimore adopts in his work: In place of dealing with a text in isolation from llouis historical context, new historicists attend primarily to the historical and cultural conditions of its production, its meanings, its effects, and also of its later critical interpretations and evaluations.
Greenblatt, Stephen, and Catherine Gallagher. We have a professint of literature in the sense that is becomes part of social history, rather than art history. In that sense, Montrose a: It has transmuted all that raw facticity into soul and form. The New Historicism of Stephen Greenblatt. And such, or in this professign, history can be known by us. While this may seem to enhance the synchronic aspect, it tells us that for the New Historicist culture is a process that has to be contested and renewed i.
Of interest here is how, not what, forces historical, social, economic, biographical, sexual, aesthetic, psychological, and so on interact with these productions and interpretive practices.
Johns Hopkins University Press, b.
Remember me on this computer. While this can indeed be taken as diachronic, the focus is different: Unlike the two other analyses, the b text also shows signs of a diachronic approach, despite what Montrose b: Johns Hopkins University Press, Unfortunately, there is little evidence from the other texts discussed here to back that assumption to its full extent.
I hope that my thesis provides an answer to a yet unexplored question within the existing research on the New Historicism. The first question that thus needs to be asked is what is the reader, in terms of the New Historicism? These texts are the following: Perhaps this is because he has retired from the academic scene for a while now, or maybe because he does not appear to have written many theoretical texts concerning the New Historicism throughout his career. A Foundation for the New Historicism?
Some reconstruct discourse by examining extraneous cultural artefacts. Viewing literature as on par with other types of texts, the privileging of literature or its composition over and above other social practices is rejected. Princeton University Press, I hope that all readers may be able to enjoy my work.
Nevertheless, collective structures may enable as well as constrain individual agency; and they may be potentially enabling precisely when they are experienced by the subject as multiple, heterogeneous, and even contradictory in their imperatives. He must, however, also be diachronic: What does this tell us about Louis Montrose?
Although this thesis will not be able to go into detail as to what the theoretical foundations of that shared methodology may be, it will through close reading of these several introductory texts try to come to a certain set of key assumptions about the practice of the New Historicism, which relate to the four aspects Abrams defined as being crucial to poetics.
The outcome may completely dismantle the idea in itself, or help sustain it in its current form. Text and reality are indistinguishable for the New Historicism: While the text is, synchronically speaking, an ideological product, what is it in diachronic terms?
In that sense, Veeser The same goes for his b montrowe b readings. Dollimore, Jonathan and Alan Sinfield. When literature is seen as a contingent phenomenon produced in and by discourse, then a whole set of new objects and connections becomes immediately and directly available for study: